Negotiating work-life balance measures with leadership

These recommendations provide a systematic framework for advocating, negotiating, implementing, and monitoring work-life balance measures, ultimately aiming to create a supportive and inclusive work environment. With a focus on addressing the needs of parents and caregivers in academic settings.

Understanding the issue

To advocate effectively for a solution, you need a thorough understanding of the problem, supported by objective, reliable, and verifiable evidence. Focus on the impact of caring responsibilities on the academic careers of women, including their mobility, productivity, and promotion (often referred to as the motherhood penalty). Use relevant data from your organisation if available.

  • Identify who will benefit from the negotiated measures.
  • Compile a list of other research organisations or universities that have implemented similar measures (best practices).
  • Determine which offices make the relevant decisions and with whom to negotiate.

Highlight the benefits (& risks)

  • Clearly outline the tangible benefits of the proposed measures for beneficiaries, all employees (including men), and the organisation as a whole.
  • Discuss the negative impacts of not taking action.
  • Anticipate possible opposing arguments and prepare counterarguments.
  • Gather evidence of positive outcomes from similar measures implemented elsewhere.

Connect to legal frameworks & policies

  • Show how the proposed measures align with organisational, national, and international legal frameworks and policies, such as:
    • The organisational mission, vision, strategy, or gender equality plan.
    • The EU Directive (2019/1158) on work-life balance for parents and carers, which mandates that workers who are parents and carers have the right to request flexible working arrangements, including remote working, flexible schedules, or reduced working hours, for caregiving purposes.

Clarify your objective

  • Consult relevant stakeholders to discuss the details of a solution, including expenses covered for example by the Parents’ Travel Grant fund and reduced duties after returning from parental leave that MINDtheGEPs partners are advocating for.
  • Prepare a clear implementation plan for the proposed measure, detailing the timetable, responsibilities, and required resources.
  • Have an alternative plan ready, such as pilot programmes in a few departments.

Build alliances

  • Strengthen your negotiation position by mobilising support from various stakeholders, particularly those most affected by the proposed measures, such as doctoral students and early-career employees.
  • Seek allies among middle-level management, including men.
  • Involve gender equality groups and trade unions in the negotiation and implementation processes.

Communicate effectively

  • Adopt a collaborative negotiation style. Instead of blaming or reprimanding for failing to meet employees' needs, focus on how to improve working conditions and enhance organisational effectiveness.
  • Be well-prepared with your key messages and support them with gathered evidence. Ensure your messages are clear, consistent, and succinct.
  • Report your negotiation attempts and results to organisational stakeholders, including doctoral students, early-career employees, and trade unions. Tailor your messaging to suit different audiences.

Embed measures

  • Aim to integrate the implemented measures into the organisational agenda and structure.

Monitor implementation of measures

  • Regularly communicate the negotiated measures and benefits to all employees.
  • Continuously monitor the implementation and effectiveness of these measures and consider future improvements.

References

Negotating for a Parent's Travel Grant

MINDtheGEPs partners are negotiating for the establishment of a Parent's Travel Grant in their organisations, to support mothers as well as fathers with caregiving duties - especially those with young children - by alleviating their childcare costs during conference and workshops.

Negotiations with local leadership rely on the expertise of each organisation’s Gender Equality Plan implementing board.

Adapting post-leave academic duties

We support the revision of duties in the academic year following parental leave and to introduce time-management rules and tools to counter the prevailing unconditional worker model that expects researchers to be always working and available.

Each MINDtheGEPs partner organisation's Gender Equality Plan implementing board, in collaboration with local project teams, will engage in negotiations with organisational leadership.

Advocating for the acknowledgment of care time

MINDtheGEPs is working to ensure that time devoted to caring for dependents, including elderly relatives, is better acknowledged in the evaluation of scientific performance for recruitment.

With the support of each MINDtheGEPs partner organisation's Gender Equality Plan implementing board, local project teams, and national authorities within the Advisory Board, negotiations will be conducted with local, regional, and national leadership.

Balancing recruitment, retention and career progression

In this deliverable, which is based on a combination of desk research, our own expertise, MTG partners’ experiences, in addition to existing guidelines, we have prepared a set of overall recommendations supporting academic and non-academic organisations to foster the awareness of gender issues in the field of recruitment, retention and career progression. Our guidelines on planned actions are developed to help to understand and prepare organisational change, which should improve gender equality in an institution.

Migalska, Alexandra., Sekuła, Paulina., Stoecker, Ewa., Ní Fhlatharta, Aiofe., & Macmahon, Helena. (2024). D4.1 – Guidelines on planned actions for recruitment and retention. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10491838

Explore key areas

SHORTCUTS

About MINDtheGEPs

Key Areas

Gender Equality Plans

Partners

Contact

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed on this website are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.

MINDTHEGEPS

MINDtheGEPs (Modifying Institutions by Developing Gender Equality Plans) has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no 101006543.

Data protection notice

Accessibility report